Bad Language

Yesterday, I read an article about a concert pianist with Tourette’s. The article recounted how the man, a former child prodigy, has faced a lifetime of rejection from orchestras, something which he attributes to his potential employers being unwilling to deal with his condition.

The article sounded entirely plausible. No matter how talented or intelligent you are, it can be incredibly hard to find employment when you have Tourette’s. In my case, one employer told me that they didn’t think they could hire me because of the “duty of care” they had to the customer. Situations like these are all-too-common, and the article shed some light on to what people with Tourette’s have to put up with, and how hard cases of discrimination can be to prove.

Even though overall it was a positive article, I did find it unfortunate when the author decided to write that, eventually, the man “conquered” his Tourette’s. For me, this was an inaccurate and somewhat bizarre choice of vocabulary.

From the sounds of it, this man was one of those with Tourette’s who find that their symptoms alleviate with age. However, even if this was the case, the man wasn’t “conquering” anything. Tourette’s is a chronic, incurable condition. It can’t be “conquered”.

To say that the man conquered his Tourette’s is to say a) you can win against Tourette’s if you try hard enough, b) anyone with Tourette’s can “fight” the condition c) those whose symptoms persist despite their age are losing somehow.

Basically, it’s just not a great thing to say.

The problem is, people often use bellicose language when describing people’s relationship with their medical conditions. We often hear of people’s “battle” with a disease, they “fight for their life”, “struggle”, “conquer”, but, ultimately, “lose”.

I’m not sure this kind of language is helpful for anyone. Fighting Tourette’s isn’t an advisable activity, because we simply don’t know enough about Tourette’s to know how to fight it. We don’t know what causes it and what doesn’t, why some medications work for some and not others, why some people grow out of their symptoms and why some people don’t.

It can be a really hard thing to do, but when you have Tourette’s, it’s important to accept that you have Tourette’s, to go with its ups and downs, and to realise that raging against it will get you precisely nowhere.

Pros and Cons of Having Tourette’s

Pros:

  • Sometimes, it’s funny.

Cons:

  • It hurts.
  • It’s embarrassing.
  • It’s exhausting to be ticcing all the time.
  • It can be harder to get or keep a job.
  • You probably have another condition like OCD, ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, depression, anxiety, or all five. All of these comorbid conditions can make life harder to live.
  • People laugh at people with Tourette’s.
  • People stare at people with Tourette’s.
  • People don’t really know what Tourette’s is, meaning that those with the condition have to constantly explain what it is.
  • People think Tourette’s is just about swearing, so if you’re one of the 75 – 90 percent of people with Tourette’s who don’t swear, people accuse you of not having the condition.
  • Tics which are rude or offensive can put you in danger of angering or offending someone.
  • People think people with Tourette’s are just pretending, that they are just saying what they want to say and then acting as though it was a tic.
  • People with Tourette’s have to put up with being the centre of attention.
  • Tourette’s is an incurable, chronic condition.

OCD Is A Mess

The other night I was having a drink with a friend when she used one of my favourite phrases: “I’m a bit OCD.”

Of course, the friend didn’t mean she had a mild case of obsessive compulsive disorder. Instead, she was talking about how she organised her handbag, about how particular she was about it, and how thorough she liked to be.

I let the comment slide, because, in the grand scheme of things, it didn’t really matter. But although the comment didn’t offend me, it did annoy me. My friend is an actual therapist, and she really should have known better.

The term “a bit OCD” is both frustrating and frustratingly familiar. Often, people think it’s OK to use mental health terms in everyday language, and often proclaiming themselves to be “so OCD”, “depressed”, or “having a panic attack”. This shouldn’t be a problem, but it is. Especially when terms like “OCD” come to mean something quite different from their medical meanings.

OCD is everyday language has come to mean “perfectionist”, “particular” or “organised”. But OCD in its true sense is a mess. Below is a guide to the difference between OCD and perfectionism:

  • People will OCD can ruminate over the same thing for hours, weeks, months, or years. These thoughts can centre on anything and be immensely frustrating. Perfectionists don’t do this.
  • People with OCD experience excessive vivid, intrusive thoughts often depicting frightening situations which will never happen. Perfectionists don’t have this.
  • People with OCD can sometimes be hoarders. Their homes will be full of things they do not need and yet cannot let go of. Perfectionists don’t have this.
  • OCD can cause those with it to act out pointless, lengthy rituals by which they check that everything is safe (that they didn’t leave the cooker on, that when they hit that bump in the road it wasn’t actually a person, that the taps aren’t still running and the door really is shut). The person with OCD will know that these time-consuming rituals are irrational, however, they have to act upon them even if they cause them distress. Perfectionists, on the other hand, like things to be in straight lines, in the right order, so they are neat and tidy and look nice.
  • OCD can lead to severe depression. Perfectionism can lead to severe tidiness.
  • OCD is a mental illness which can ruin your life. Perfectionism is a personality trait to put on your CV or covering letter.